Проверьте правильность перевода

  • Vitaly, I agree to WAS TO MEET but you wrote WAS TO HAVE MET that I don't agree to.

  • Hello, Helen!
    In fact both versions are possible in this case.The action refers to the past and did not actually take place. Please read Practical Grammar of English, Kachalova and Izrailevich, pp.235-236.If you do, you will be sure to better undersatand this usage.

    Best wishes